<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Contact allergy in 330 dermatological patients

Name: Contact allergy in 330 dermatological patients
Keywords: Dermatologie, Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Compounding, Methanol, Leg Ulcer, Eczema, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Cosmetics, Middle Aged

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 May 1978 Belgium Publisher:WileyJournal:Contact Dermatitis, volume 4, pages 270-276 (issn: 0105-1873, eissn: 1600-0536,

Authors: Blondeel, Arlette; Oleffe, Jacques; Achten, Georges;

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1978.tb04557.x

pmid: 154373

handle: 2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/127107

Contact allergy in 330 dermatological patients

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

A total of 330 patients with eczematous lesions were tested with 27 topical substances. Among the 88 patients with leg ulcers, 85 (2 %) were allergic to one or more substances present in one out of two cases of allergy to wool alcohol. Among the 242 patients suffering from eczematous dermatitis, ihe percentage of allergic reactions reached 54.6 %. A great number of allergic reactions to cetyl alcohol (11.2 %), chloramphenicol (10 %) and sodium lauryl sulfate (6.4 %) was observed. These allergens are not included in the European standard series adopted by the ICDRG. The findings are discussed and compared with data taken from the literature.

Country

Belgium

Related Organizations

Université Libre de Bruxelles
Belgium

Keywords

Dermatologie, Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Compounding, Methanol, Leg Ulcer, Eczema, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Cosmetics, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Dermatitis, Atopic, Ointments, Chloramphenicol, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Alcohols, Humans, Drug Eruptions

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	54
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average