
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 363337
abstract Gingival bleeding is a difficult parameter to assess in experimental trials. The Confirmed Bleeding Day was recently developed as a measurement for this purpose. It was observed that considerable variations existed between the measurements made in a pilot study and an experimental trial, and these variations were subjected to a statistical analysis. The reasons for the variations are discussed, and recommendations made for the design of experimental trials involving gingival bleeding.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Chlorhexidine, Mouthwashes, Humans, Pilot Projects, Gingival Hemorrhage, Gingivitis, Oral Hemorrhage
Clinical Trials as Topic, Chlorhexidine, Mouthwashes, Humans, Pilot Projects, Gingival Hemorrhage, Gingivitis, Oral Hemorrhage
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
