<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 4082903
A randomized, cross-over study was designed to compare the effects of an increased ratio (from 1:10 to 1:4) of carbidopa to levodopa on the fate of levodopa and carbidopa in 11 healthy subjects. Four combinations of carbidopa/levodopa (10 mg/100 mg, 25 mg/100 mg, 25 mg/250 mg, 62.5/250 mg) were used. Plasma levodopa, carbidopa, dopamine and dopac concentrations as well as urinary excretions of levodopa and dopac were determined by a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection after a single carbidopa/levodopa tablet. As the ratio of carbidopa to levodopa increased, there was a significant increase in apparent t1/2 and AUC values of levodopa. At the same time the urinary excretion of levodopa increased and that of dopac decreased. The plasma ratios of levodopa/dopamine and levodopa/dopac and the urinary ratio of levodopa/dopac also increased. There were less subjective side-effects in the 1:4 groups than in the 1:10 groups. It is concluded that increasing the amount of carbidopa in relation to levodopa may be beneficial and further clinical studies are clearly indicated.
Adult, Male, Dopamine, Carbidopa, Levodopa, Kinetics, Random Allocation, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid, Humans, Drug Interactions, Female
Adult, Male, Dopamine, Carbidopa, Levodopa, Kinetics, Random Allocation, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid, Humans, Drug Interactions, Female
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |