Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Gastrointestinal End...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Authors: Todd H. Baron; John L. Petrini; Klaus Mergener; Brenda J. Hoffman; Bret T. Petersen; Brian C. Jacobson; Jonathan Cohen; +5 Authors

Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has become integral to the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal (GI) and mediastinal mass lesions. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) allows the endoscopist to obtain tissue or fluid for cytologic and chemical analysis, adding to the procedure’s utility. Furthermore, the recent development of EUS guided tru-cut biopsy techniques enable histologic sampling in selected cases. The clinical effectiveness of EUS and EUSFNA depends on the judicious use of these techniques and the skill of the endosonographer. Requiring both advanced endoscopic ability and radiologic interpretation, sufficient training in EUS is generally beyond the realm of a standard GI fellowship. Recognizing the specialized nature of EUS and EUSFNA, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has published specific criteria for the training of, and the granting of clinical privileges for, individuals who want to perform these procedures (1, 2). The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)/ASGE task force has also established the following indicators to aid in the recognition of high-quality EUS examinations. The levels of evidence supporting these quality indicators were graded according to Table 1. Such indicators would permit the development of quality assurance programs and enable endosonographers to share their personal quality measures with patients and other interested parties.

Keywords

Quality Assurance, Health Care, Digestive System Diseases, Humans, Endosonography, Quality Indicators, Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    57
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
57
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!