
pmid: 19909331
Summary: Sudden death in epilepsy has recently found its way into both civil and criminal litigation in the United States. Civil cases commonly involve actions or inactions by physicians with respect to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) alleged to have caused sudden unexpected death in a patient with epilepsy (SUDEP). The context may be discontinuation or change of AEDs or failure to warn of the complication of SUDEP. A common issue in adjudication of such cases is the role of causality of medication type and level in SUDEP. Current knowledge does not permit an accurate assessment of risk for medication discontinuation or poor compliance. Related issues are discussed. In criminal litigation, SUDEP has been accepted by a Federal Court as a cause of death in a crime victim for whom the actions of the accused caused an epileptic state.
Epilepsy, Malpractice, Forensic Medicine, Forensic Psychiatry, United States, Patient Care Management, Death, Sudden, Cause of Death, Criminal Law, Humans, Anticonvulsants, Coroners and Medical Examiners
Epilepsy, Malpractice, Forensic Medicine, Forensic Psychiatry, United States, Patient Care Management, Death, Sudden, Cause of Death, Criminal Law, Humans, Anticonvulsants, Coroners and Medical Examiners
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
