Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian and New Z...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Safety of Modern Contraceptives

Authors: Cindy Broholm; Allan Rosenfield;

The Safety of Modern Contraceptives

Abstract

Mortality is the greatest concern in assessing risks of modern reversible contraception. The problems identified with older oral contraceptives (OCs) have decreased with the lower doses in current OCs. These problems include cardiovascular and thrombotic effects changes in lipid metabolism breast cancer liver cancer increased risk of chlamydia cervicitis no protection against sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and HIV and interferes with breast feeding. On the other hand OCs protect against anemia menstrual disorders ectopic pregnancy acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and ovarian and endometrial cancer. Since the contraceptive implant Norplant has no estrogens it does not have the cardiovascular risks associated with OCs. Possible risks from Norplant use include changes in carbohydrate liver and lipid metabolism but they tend to be clinically insignificant and no protection against STDs/HIV. Menstruation disorders are the major side effect. Apparent benefits of Norplant are protection against anemia and ectopic pregnancy and no effect on lactation. The injectable contraceptive Depo-Provera causes menstrual changes may slightly increase the risk of breast cancer may decrease bone density and does not protect against STDs/HIV. It protects against endometrial cancer. It has no effect on metabolism. Risks associated with the IUD include PID perforation anemia increased menstrual bleeding and pregnancy. IUDs do not affect the quantity of composition of breast milk. They are best suited for women in a mutually monogamous long-term relationship. Barrier methods provide some degree of protection against STDs/HIV and PID. Condoms provide the most protection. They do not affect lactation. Their major complications are contraceptive failure and risks associated with pregnancy. For all women especially those in high risk categories one must balance the risks of modern contraceptive use with the risks of childbearing and with their benefits.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Contraindications, Smoking, Age Factors, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Pregnancy, Unwanted, Consumer Product Safety, Pregnancy, Family Planning Services, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Female, Contraceptive Devices, Contraceptives, Oral, Intrauterine Devices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?