
pmid: 6121581
Summary. Fifty primigravidae were given either lorazepam (2 mg) or identical dummy tablets in early labour, in a randomized double‐blind fashion. Analgesia (standardized at pethidine 100 mg) was given as required, and pain relief was assessed by visual analogue scales. Analgesia was significantly better in those mothers who had received lorazepam. There was a higher incidence of respiratory, depression at birth in the infants in this group, although this was not statistically significant. Patients given lorazepam were all satisfied with their analgesic regimen compared with half of those given an inactive tablet. There was a higher incidence of amnesia for labour in the active group. There is a need for a similar study of the effects of other drugs which arc given to supplement pethidine in labour.
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Labor, Obstetric, Adolescent, Meperidine, Premedication, Lorazepam, Random Allocation, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Double-Blind Method, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Maternal-Fetal Exchange
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Labor, Obstetric, Adolescent, Meperidine, Premedication, Lorazepam, Random Allocation, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Double-Blind Method, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Maternal-Fetal Exchange
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
