
pmid: 22008225
ABSTRACTThe review aims to discuss current concepts in advance care planning (ACP) for patients with COPD, and to provide a narrative review of recent trends in ACP and end‐of‐life care for patients with COPD. ACP, which involves patient–clinician communication about end‐of‐life care, can improve outcomes for patients and their families, and may be especially relevant for patients with COPD. Effective patient–clinician communication is needed to inform and prepare patients about their diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and what dying might be like. It is important for clinicians to understand patients' values and preferences for life‐sustaining treatments as well for their site of terminal care. Unfortunately, discussions about ACP and end‐of‐life care in current practice are scarce, and their quality is often poor. ACP can improve outcomes for patients and their relatives. The challenge remains in the practical implementation of ACP in the clinical setting, especially for patients with COPD. ACP should be implemented alongside curative‐restorative care for patients with advanced COPD. The disease course of COPD is such that there will rarely be a clear transition point predicting the timing of the need for initiation of end‐of‐life care. Future studies should focus on interventions that facilitate concurrent ACP and prepare patients for making in‐the‐moment decisions, with the goal of improving the quality of end‐of‐life care.
Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Communication, Palliative Care, Prognosis, Advance Care Planning, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Dyspnea, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female
Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Communication, Palliative Care, Prognosis, Advance Care Planning, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Dyspnea, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
