
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>A total of 417 strains (361 Enterobacteriaceae, 56 Vibrionaceae) was examined in all the available Minitek system tests. The results were processed through four successive identification schemes devised by the manufacturer and the proportion of strains correctly identified, not identified or incorrectly identified determined for each scheme. From the results, a probability matrix was constructed incorporating all 35 Minitek tests. Test results for each strain were then processed through this matrix to determine its success in identification. From the matrix the order of separating value of the tests was determined. Forty‐three of the strains were each tested three times to assess the level of test reproducibility; the corrected error rate was 0.85%.
Bacteriological Techniques, Enterobacteriaceae, Computers, Predictive Value of Tests, Vibrionaceae
Bacteriological Techniques, Enterobacteriaceae, Computers, Predictive Value of Tests, Vibrionaceae
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
