
doi: 10.1111/inm.12205
pmid: 26875931
AbstractThere is an increased interest in exploring the use of sensory rooms in psychiatric inpatient care. Sensory rooms can provide stimulation via sight, smell, hearing, touch and taste in a demand‐free environment that is controlled by the patient. The rooms may reduce patients’ distress and agitation, as well as rates of seclusion and restraint. Successful implementation of sensory rooms is influenced by the attitudes and approach of staff. This paper presents a study of the experiences of 126 staff members who worked with sensory rooms in a Swedish inpatient psychiatry setting. A cross‐sectional descriptive survey design was used. Data were collected by a web based self‐report 12‐item questionnaire that included both open‐ and closed‐ended questions. Our findings strengthen the results of previous research in this area in many ways. Content analyses revealed three main categories: hopes and concerns, focusing on patients’ self‐care, and the room as a sanctuary. Although staff initially described both negative and positive expectations of sensory rooms, after working with the rooms, there was a strong emphasis on more positive experiences, such as letting go of control and observing an increase in patients’ self‐confidence, emotional self‐care and well‐being. Our findings support the important principals of person‐centred nursing and recovery‐oriented mental health and the ability of staff to implement these principles by working with sensory rooms.
Adult, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Physical Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Aged
Adult, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Physical Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
