
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1111/ijn.12560
pmid: 28631438
AbstractAimTo analyze the level of nurses' foot health and its associations with work well‐being.MethodsA descriptive, cross‐sectional study design was applied to a random sample of Finnish nurses (n = 411). The data were collected between May 18 and June 21, 2015 using a self‐administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument and analyzed using descriptive statistics and parametric tests.ResultsNurses had a variety of foot problems. Dry skin, foot pain, and corns or calluses were the most prevalent foot problems. Long‐term diseases, the need for a physician's appointment due to foot problems, and decreased working ability were all associated with foot health. This finding was also supported by multivariate analysis.ConclusionsFoot problems are common among nurses and are associated with individual and work‐related factors. Prevention of foot problems in nurses should be prioritized to promote their working ability and predisposing factors identified as potential intervention targets.
Adult, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Foot Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Nursing Staff, Finland, ta316, Aged
Adult, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Foot Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Nursing Staff, Finland, ta316, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
