Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Dermatology
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Anti‐Desmoglein 3 Avidity Correlates Better With Pemphigus Vulgaris Severity Than Anti‐Desmoglein 3 Concentration

Authors: Branislav Lekic; Branka Bonaci‐Nikolic; Jovan Lalosevic; Dragana Jovanovic; Dubravka Zivanovic; Milos Nikolic;

Anti‐Desmoglein 3 Avidity Correlates Better With Pemphigus Vulgaris Severity Than Anti‐Desmoglein 3 Concentration

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies targeting desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) and/or desmoglein 1 (Dsg1). While antibody concentration is routinely used to assess disease activity, the role of antibody avidity in PV monitoring has not been elucidated. Methods Sixty‐three consecutive, newly diagnosed, treatment‐naïve patients with PV were enrolled in this retrospective‐prospective study. PV severity was assessed using the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) and classified as mild (≤ 15), moderate (> 15, ≤ 45), or severe (> 45). Anti‐Dsg3 and anti‐Dsg1 IgG antibodies' concentration and avidity were determined using conventional and urea‐modified enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. Thirty‐three patients were re‐evaluated at the beginning of clinical remission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine optimal cut‐off values and odds ratios (ORs) for anti‐Dsg3 concentration and avidity to distinguish active disease from remission, and mild from moderate‐to‐severe disease. Results Anti‐Dsg3 avidity showed a stronger correlation with PDAI ( r = 0.474, p < 0.001) than anti‐Dsg3 concentration ( r = 0.363, p = 0.004). Anti‐Dsg1 concentration correlated with PDAI ( r = 0.476, p = 0.001), while anti‐Dsg1 avidity did not ( r = 0.216, p = 0.141). Anti‐Dsg3 avidity was a better marker of disease severity than anti‐Dsg3 concentration ( p = 0.003 vs. p = 0.014). Among 13 patients in remission who were still anti‐Dsg3‐positive, avidity decreased more significantly than concentration ( p = 0.007 vs. p = 0.016). Avidity cut‐off of 25.46% distinguished active disease from remission (OR = 3.48), and avidity 35.02% threshold differentiated mild from moderate/severe disease (OR = 6.36). Conclusions This is the first study to assess the correlation between PDAI and anti‐Dsg3/anti‐Dsg1 avidity. Anti‐Dsg3 avidity showed the strongest positive correlation with PDAI, announcing the role of antibody avidity as a valuable biomarker in monitoring PV activity.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!