
doi: 10.1111/ijd.13044
pmid: 26547761
AbstractBackgroundRecalcitrant non‐actinic cheilitis may indicate contact allergy.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of allergic contact cheilitis (ACC) in patients with non‐actinic cheilitis and to identify the most relevant allergens.MethodsWe used an institutional database to identify patients with non‐actinic cheilitis who underwent patch testing between January 1, 2001, and August 31, 2011, and conducted a retrospective review of patch test results in these patients. Additional data were obtained from institutional electronic medical records.ResultsNinety‐one patients (70 [77%] female; mean age: 51 years) were included in the study. Almost half (41 [45%]) had a final diagnosis of ACC. Patch testing was performed in line with universally accepted methods, with application on day 1, allergen removal and an initial reading on day 3, and the final reading on day 5. The allergens of most significance were fragrance mix, Myroxylon pereirae resin, dodecyl gallate, octyl gallate, and benzoic acid. Nickel was the most relevant metal allergen.ConclusionsContact allergy is an important consideration in recalcitrant cheilitis. Fragrances, antioxidants, and preservatives dominated the list of relevant allergens in our patients. Nickel and gold were among the top 10 allergens. Almost half (45%) of these patients had a final diagnosis of ACC. Patch testing beyond the oral complete series should be undertaken in any investigation of non‐actinic cheilitis.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Allergens, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Young Adult, Cheilitis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Allergens, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Young Adult, Cheilitis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
