
doi: 10.1111/idh.12490
pmid: 33523601
AbstractObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of dental caries and to identify risk factors for dental caries in an elderly population between 2008 and 2018.MethodsThis longitudinal study used data from a questionnaire survey and a clinical examination administered on two occasions 10 years apart to 273 individuals who were 65 and 75 years of age in 2008. The variables included were prevalence of dental caries as well as socioeconomic and socio‐behavioural factors.ResultsThe number of teeth decreased in both age groups by a mean of 2 over the 10‐year study period, but the prevalence of dental caries remained stable. Approximately, a quarter of the participants had caries lesions. Toothbrushing once a day or less was the factor most strongly correlated with dental caries lesions (OR: 3.82, 95% CI: 1.68–8.66, p = 0.001), followed by need for homecare (OR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.55–7.93, p = 0.003) and interproximal cleaning less than once a day (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.36–5.19, p = 0.004).ConclusionsThis longitudinal study revealed no increase in the prevalence of dental caries lesions, indicating that good oral health can be preserved among elderly people. The highest risk for dental caries lesions was among participants with inadequate oral hygiene routines (toothbrushing once a day or less and seldom using interproximal devices) and in need of help in daily living, emphasizing the importance of oral hygiene and collaboration between dental services and community‐based health care.
Toothbrushing, longitudinal, Dental Caries Susceptibility, 610, Oral Health, Dental Caries, Odontologi, Oral Hygiene, elderly, socioeconomic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dentistry, 617, dental caries, Prevalence, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Aged
Toothbrushing, longitudinal, Dental Caries Susceptibility, 610, Oral Health, Dental Caries, Odontologi, Oral Hygiene, elderly, socioeconomic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dentistry, 617, dental caries, Prevalence, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
