
Over recent years, use of the LigaSure™ vessel sealing device has increased in major abdominal surgery to include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). LigaSure™ use during PD has expanded to include all steps of the procedure, including the division of the uncinate margin. This introduces the potential for thermal major vascular injury or margin positivity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LigaSure™ usage in PD in comparison to established dissection techniques.One hundred and forty-eight patients who underwent PD from 2007 to 2012 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital were identified from a retrospective database. Two groups were recognized: those in which the LigaSure™ device was used (N = 114), and in those it was not (N = 34). Peri-operative outcomes were compared.Vascular intra-operative complications directly caused by thermal injury from LigaSure™ use occurred in 1.8% of patients. Overall vascular intra-operative complications, uncinate margin positivity, blood loss, length of stay, and complication severity were not significantly different between groups. The mean operative time was 77 min less (P < 0.010) in the LigaSure™ group. Savings per case where the LigaSure™ was used amounted to $1776.73.LigaSure™ usage during PD is safe and effective. It is associated with decreased operative times, which may decrease operative costs in PD.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Neoplasm, Residual, Hepatology, Adolescent, Hemostatic Techniques, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Gastroenterology, Blood Loss, Surgical, Equipment Design, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Cost Savings, Humans, Female, Hospital Costs, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Neoplasm, Residual, Hepatology, Adolescent, Hemostatic Techniques, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Gastroenterology, Blood Loss, Surgical, Equipment Design, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Cost Savings, Humans, Female, Hospital Costs, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
