
doi: 10.1111/hae.14562
pmid: 35415926
AbstractIntroductionThe first external quality assessment (EQA) in Thrombosis and Haemostasis was elaborated over 20 years ago, and since then, several national and international EQA institutions have been established.AimDisplay the benefits of EQA programs.MethodsThe spectrum of EQA action was evaluated ranges from improving the performance of the local laboratory to highlighting inadequate diagnostic tests that need to be replaced by new technologies.ResultsThe first result approach is related to a national management of quality in laboratories. In recent years, Brazil has invested in an EQA program to aid public policy in the laboratory area. During this period, a group of haemostasis laboratory specialists were invited to manage the results and help the Ministry of Health with applying these results as a strategy to improve laboratories. Thus, in collaboration with NEQAS‐BC, the University of Campinas – UNICAMP, established a Brazilian EQA program for Blood Coagulation. The second result approach is related to FVIII inhibitor assay performance evaluation, which is another type of EQA program benefit. Despite the assay being considered the gold standard to measure neutralised immunoglobulins for FVIII since 1975, over 40 years ago, the test still has a high coefficient of variation. Results from NEQAS‐BC and WFH IEQAS program demonstrate the inter‐laboratory variation across the United Kingdom over the last years and among emergent countries.ConclusionThe EQA programs have an important educational role in helping countries manage their public policy and in the international inquiry regarding the necessity of new technologies in haemostasis.
Hemostasis, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Humans, Thrombosis, Laboratories, Blood Coagulation, Program Evaluation
Hemostasis, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Humans, Thrombosis, Laboratories, Blood Coagulation, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
