
doi: 10.1111/gcb.70515
pmid: 40977595
ABSTRACTAfforestation plays a crucial role in mitigating climate change, yet the transfer of soil phosphorus (P) to aboveground biomass may lead to soil P limitation. However, the influences of afforestation on soil P fractions and availability remain unclear. Here, we investigated soil P fractions at 144 paired sampling sites by comparing afforested lands with adjacent non‐afforested lands in subtropical China. Afforestation increased the proportions of available P, labile P, and moderately‐labile P, while decreasing inorganic P concentrations, with no significant effect on soil total P. These shifts were strongly coupled with the increase in organic P and the decline in stable P. Notably, afforestation with broad‐leaved species (i.e., Quercus variabilis) increased soil organic P concentration, while afforestation with coniferous species (i.e., Pinus massoniana and Platycladus orientalis) reduced soil inorganic P concentration. Afforestation weakened the effects of soil microclimates on labile P fractions (e.g., decreased with moisture) in non‐afforested soil. In contrast, plant nutrients (e.g., leaf P concentration) exhibited positive effects on inorganic P fractions in afforested soils. Soil iron oxides (Feo) were the primary cause of P variations in both afforested and non‐afforested soils; particularly, lower Feo and soil pH under afforested lands likely promoted the desorption of more non‐stable P fractions compared to the non‐afforested soils. Overall, our findings suggest that afforestation may alleviate soil P limitation by enhancing the concentration of labile and moderately‐labile P fractions, while soil inorganic P fractions are crucial for regulating soil P dynamics, thereby providing insights for optimizing afforestation practices.
Soil, China, Climate Change, Phosphorus, Forests, Trees
Soil, China, Climate Change, Phosphorus, Forests, Trees
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
