Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Global Change Biolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Global Change Biology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Redistribution of Soil Phosphorus Fractions Alleviates Phosphorus Limitations Following Afforestation

Authors: Minghui Wu; Quanjie Xu; Jiao Feng; Xueyu Wang; Deping Zhai; Xiaoli Cheng;

Redistribution of Soil Phosphorus Fractions Alleviates Phosphorus Limitations Following Afforestation

Abstract

ABSTRACTAfforestation plays a crucial role in mitigating climate change, yet the transfer of soil phosphorus (P) to aboveground biomass may lead to soil P limitation. However, the influences of afforestation on soil P fractions and availability remain unclear. Here, we investigated soil P fractions at 144 paired sampling sites by comparing afforested lands with adjacent non‐afforested lands in subtropical China. Afforestation increased the proportions of available P, labile P, and moderately‐labile P, while decreasing inorganic P concentrations, with no significant effect on soil total P. These shifts were strongly coupled with the increase in organic P and the decline in stable P. Notably, afforestation with broad‐leaved species (i.e., Quercus variabilis) increased soil organic P concentration, while afforestation with coniferous species (i.e., Pinus massoniana and Platycladus orientalis) reduced soil inorganic P concentration. Afforestation weakened the effects of soil microclimates on labile P fractions (e.g., decreased with moisture) in non‐afforested soil. In contrast, plant nutrients (e.g., leaf P concentration) exhibited positive effects on inorganic P fractions in afforested soils. Soil iron oxides (Feo) were the primary cause of P variations in both afforested and non‐afforested soils; particularly, lower Feo and soil pH under afforested lands likely promoted the desorption of more non‐stable P fractions compared to the non‐afforested soils. Overall, our findings suggest that afforestation may alleviate soil P limitation by enhancing the concentration of labile and moderately‐labile P fractions, while soil inorganic P fractions are crucial for regulating soil P dynamics, thereby providing insights for optimizing afforestation practices.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Soil, China, Climate Change, Phosphorus, Forests, Trees

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!