Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Global Change Biolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Global Change Biology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency and Growth Rates in Soil: Global Patterns and Drivers

Global Patterns and Drivers
Authors: Junxi Hu; Yongxing Cui; Stefano Manzoni; Shixing Zhou; J. Hans C. Cornelissen; Congde Huang; Joshua Schimel; +1 Authors

Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency and Growth Rates in Soil: Global Patterns and Drivers

Abstract

ABSTRACTCarbon use efficiency (CUE) of microbial communities in soil quantifies the proportion of organic carbon (C) taken up by microorganisms that is allocated to growing microbial biomass as well as used for reparation of cell components. This C amount in microbial biomass is subsequently involved in microbial turnover, partly leading to microbial necromass formation, which can be further stabilized in soil. To unravel the underlying regulatory factors and spatial patterns of CUE on a large scale and across biomes (forests, grasslands, croplands), we evaluated 670 individual CUE data obtained by three commonly used approaches: (i) tracing of a substrate C by 13C (or 14C) incorporation into microbial biomass and respired CO2 (hereafter 13C‐substrate), (ii) incorporation of 18O from water into DNA (18O‐water), and (iii) stoichiometric modelling based on the activities of enzymes responsible for C and nitrogen (N) cycles. The global mean of microbial CUE in soil depends on the approach: 0.59 for the 13C‐substrate approach, and 0.34 for the stoichiometric modelling and for the 18O‐water approaches. Across biomes, microbial CUE was highest in grassland soils, followed by cropland and forest soils. A power‐law relationship was identified between microbial CUE and growth rates, indicating that faster C utilization for growth corresponds to reduced C losses for maintenance and associated with mortality. Microbial growth rate increased with the content of soil organic C, total N, total phosphorus, and fungi/bacteria ratio. Our results contribute to understanding the linkage between microbial growth rates and CUE, thereby offering insights into the impacts of climate change and ecosystem disturbances on microbial physiology with consequences for C cycling.

Countries
Netherlands, Germany
Keywords

nutrient limitation, Soil, carbon use efficiency, Microbiota, carbon cycling, Biomass, Forests, microbial stoichiometry, Grassland, microbial physiology, Soil Microbiology, Carbon, Carbon Cycle

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Green
hybrid