Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Fundamental and Clin...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Patch testing versus interferon‐gamma release assay in evaluation of drug eruptions

Authors: Yehonatan Kaplan; Ilan Goldberg; Eli Sprecher; Dan Slodownik;

Patch testing versus interferon‐gamma release assay in evaluation of drug eruptions

Abstract

Abstract Delayed‐onset T‐cell‐mediated cutaneous adverse drug reactions are an uncommon but potentially serious result of medication exposures. Identification of culprit medications is crucial, but clinical diagnosis is often difficult. Patch tests and interferon‐gamma release assays (IFNγ‐RA) were previously reported as potentially useful ancillary tests, while rechallenges remain the reference standard test. We compared the number of positive test results with patch testing and IFNγ‐RA for drugs implicated as possible causes of cutaneous reactions. Fifty‐one patients with a suspected cutaneous drug eruption underwent patch testing and IFNγ‐RA for suspected drugs. Participants were followed up at least 9 months after the onset of the rash with results compared with the clinical diagnosis. Forty‐two patients presented with morbilliform/eczematous eruptions; five were diagnosed with fixed drug eruption (FDE) and four with erythema multiforme. None had positive patch testing to the drugs tested. A total of 8/51 (15.6%) patients had positive reaction by the IFNγ‐RA, and an additional 11 (21.6%) patients had borderline results. Positive or borderline results were more likely in patients with FDE (80%) than morbilliform/eczematous eruptions (30.9%) or erythema multiforme (25%). Our study emphasizes the necessity of additional effective ancillary tests in the evaluation of drug eruptions and supports the use of IFNγ‐RA for drug testing as a tool for identifying medications associated with cutaneous drug eruptions.

Keywords

Erythema Multiforme, Humans, Drug Eruptions, Patch Tests, Interferon-gamma Release Tests, Skin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!