
doi: 10.1111/exsy.12159
AbstractCollaborative indicators derived from participants' interactions can be used to support and improve their collaborative behaviour. In this research, we focus on automatically identifying recommendation opportunities in the Collaborative Logical Framework from participants' interactions. Different information sources have been considered: (a) statistical collaborative indicators; (b) social interactions; (c) opinions received by the participants via ratings; and (d) users' affective state and personality. The recommendations have been elicited considering the generality and transferability of the participants' interactions provided by the Collaborative Logical Framework. As a result, three scenarios have been identified that lead us to propose meaningful grouping suggestions and recommendations, which ultimately aimed to ground an informed personalized support to the participants in intensive collaborative frameworks.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
