
AbstractWe develop an analytical framework for predicting the fitness of hybrid genotypes, based on Fisher’s geometric model. We first show that all of the model parameters have a simple geometrical and biological interpretation. Hybrid fitness decomposes into intrinsic effects of hybridity and heterozygosity, and extrinsic measures of the (local) adaptedness of the parental lines; and all of these correspond to distances in a phenotypic space. We also show how these quantities change over the course of divergence, with convergence to a characteristic pattern of intrinsic isolation. Using individual-based simulations, we then show that the predictions apply to a wide range of population genetic regimes, and divergence conditions, including allopatry and parapatry, local adaptation and drift. We next connect our results to the quantitative genetics of line crosses in variable or patchy environments. This relates the geometrical distances to quantities that can be estimated from cross data, and provides a simple interpretation of the “composite effects” in the quantitative genetics partition. Finally, we develop extensions to the model, involving selectively-induced disequilibria, and variable phenotypic dominance. The geometry of fitness landscapes provides a unifying framework for understanding speciation, and wider patterns of hybrid fitness.
Fisher's geometric model, line crosses, quantitative genetics, speciation, Models, Genetic, [SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], [SDV.BID.EVO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], Hybridization, Genetic, Original Articles, hybrid fitness
Fisher's geometric model, line crosses, quantitative genetics, speciation, Models, Genetic, [SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], [SDV.BID.EVO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], Hybridization, Genetic, Original Articles, hybrid fitness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
