Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Epilepsiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Epilepsia
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Electrographic screening for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in a single sleep–wake cycle

Authors: John A. Mason; Elizabeth Juarez‐Colunga; Kelly G. Knupp;

Electrographic screening for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in a single sleep–wake cycle

Abstract

Abstract Objective Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common and urgent diagnosis with seizure and nonseizure mimics. Evaluation with prolonged video–electroencephalography (EEG) can be time‐consuming and costly. This study investigated the use of EEG review of a single sleep–wake cycle to exclude IESS. Methods We retrospectively reviewed video‐EEG studies to rule out IESS in children between the ages of 2 months and 2 years in the period from January 2019 through June 2020. EEG studies were reviewed from the start of the recording through the first sleep–wake cycle and scored as “normal,” “consistent with IESS,” or “abnormal but not diagnostic of IESS.” Scores were compared to the clinical report created by analysis of the entire video‐EEG. Results Inclusion criteria were met in 238 EEG studies. The mean patient age was 7.6 months. The median duration of the full study was 908 min, compared to 107.5 min for the first sleep–wake cycle only. The median difference in recording time was 801 min, p ‐value < .01. Scored outcomes were similar. Sixty‐eight percent of EEG studies were scored as “normal” on first sleep–wake cycle review as compared to 63% on full study review, 13% scored as “consistent with IESS” compared to 16% and 19% scored as “abnormal but not diagnostic of IESS” compared to 21%. Sensitivity and specificity of the first sleep–wake cycle review for studies “consistent with IESS” was 84% and 100%, respectively. No cases of IESS were scored as normal on first sleep–wake cycle review. Significance A single sleep–wake cycle captured on EEG can triage studies when IESS is suspected. A normal first sleep–wake cycle did not miss cases of IESS and could result in reduced EEG recording time. Because most of these cases presented to an emergency department, a normal first sleep–wake cycle may help providers determine the acuity, or necessity, of further testing.

Keywords

Male, Child, Preschool, Video Recording, Humans, Infant, Electroencephalography, Female, Wakefulness, Sleep, Spasms, Infantile, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!