
SummaryObjectiveCommon data elements (CDEs) are currently unavailable for mobile health (mHealth) in epilepsy devices and related applications. As a result, despite expansive growth of new digital services for people with epilepsy, information collected is often not interoperable or directly comparable. We aim to correct this problem through development of industry‐wide standards for mHealth epilepsy data.MethodsUsing a group of stakeholders from industry, academia, and patient advocacy organizations, we offer a consensus statement for the elements that may facilitate communication among different systems.ResultsA consensus statement is presented for epilepsy mHealth CDEs.SignificanceAlthough it is not exclusive, we believe that the use of a minimal common information denominator, specifically these CDEs, will promote innovation, accelerate scientific discovery, and enhance clinical usage across applications and devices in the epilepsy mHealth space. As a consequence, people with epilepsy will have greater flexibility and ultimately more powerful tools to improve their lives.
common data elements, Clinical Sciences, 610, Clinical sciences, Neurodegenerative, seizure diary, Clinical Research, Terminology as Topic, Humans, Neurology & Neurosurgery, Common Data Elements, Epilepsy, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, 600, Telemedicine, Brain Disorders, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), mHealth, Neurology, standards, epilepsy, devices
common data elements, Clinical Sciences, 610, Clinical sciences, Neurodegenerative, seizure diary, Clinical Research, Terminology as Topic, Humans, Neurology & Neurosurgery, Common Data Elements, Epilepsy, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, 600, Telemedicine, Brain Disorders, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), mHealth, Neurology, standards, epilepsy, devices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
