
A new mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) material has been developed with a modified composition that requires investigations to support its clinical use. This study evaluated the biocompatibility and biomineralization of this new MTA material and compared it with that of two other MTA cements over time. Tubes containing materials (or empty tubes as controls) were inserted into the subcutaneous tissues of 40 rats. On days 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90, the tubes were removed with the surrounding tissues, which were either stained with haematoxylin and eosin or von Kossa for further analyses or unstained for observation under polarized light. On days 7 and 15, moderate inflammation was observed in most specimens, and the fibrous capsule was thick. On day 30, there was mild inflammation in all groups, and the fibrous capsule was thin. On days 60 and 90, there was mild inflammation in the material groups, while the control group showed no inflammation, although no statistically significant difference between the groups was observed and the fibrous capsule was thin. All material groups showed structures that stained with von Kossa and could be observed under polarized light; this was not found for the control. In conclusion, the new MTA material had biocompatibility and biomineralization properties similar to those of the two existing MTA materials.
Biomineralization, Male, dental cements, Dental Cements, Biocompatible Materials, 630, Subcutaneous Tissue, dental materials, Animals, Rats, Wistar, Aluminum Compounds, Drug Implants, Inflammation, mineral trioxide aggregate, Silicates, Oxides, Calcium Compounds, Rats, endodontics, Drug Combinations, inflammation, Bismuth
Biomineralization, Male, dental cements, Dental Cements, Biocompatible Materials, 630, Subcutaneous Tissue, dental materials, Animals, Rats, Wistar, Aluminum Compounds, Drug Implants, Inflammation, mineral trioxide aggregate, Silicates, Oxides, Calcium Compounds, Rats, endodontics, Drug Combinations, inflammation, Bismuth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
