
doi: 10.1111/eos.12529
pmid: 30178555
When celebrating 100 yr of dental research in the Nordic dental research community (i.e. Nordisk Odontologisk Förening (NOF)), it is relevant to include dental implant treatment. In essence, the successful progress of implant treatment has added both to the quality of life for patients and also to many aspects of professional development and job satisfaction for dentists. When appreciating the success story it also seems relevant to highlight some of the problems related to this treatment. Both technical and biological complications have often been ignored when reporting long‐term results following implant treatment. Different opinions have been expressed in relation to the etiology of peri‐implant diseases. Some even choose to ignore this condition as a clinical problem. This article presents a short overview of peri‐implant diseases (i.e. peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis). The lack of internationally agreed disease definitions for peri‐implant diseases, as with periodontitis, results in wide variation of estimates for the occurrence of peri‐implant diseases when epidemiological data are reported. The profession still strives to find and define the best way to deal with peri‐implant diseases once they are accurately diagnosed. Awareness of the tissue conditions in the peri‐implant area, and relevant action when indicated, seems to be critical for the continued long‐term successful outcome of dental implant treatment.
Dental Implants, Stomatitis, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Humans, Peri-Implantitis
Dental Implants, Stomatitis, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Humans, Peri-Implantitis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
