
doi: 10.1111/ejh.14382
pmid: 39789609
ABSTRACTPurposeThe prognosis of relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma remains a concern. This study aimed to compare the effects of various patient‐ and disease‐related factors on the prognosis of relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).MethodsWe retrospectively collected real‐world data from eight Finnish hospitals on 198 patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2003 and 2020. Characteristics of the patients were available. At total of 63 patients with relapses were included after excluding seven isolated ocular relapses.ResultsThe median progression‐free survival after relapse was 3 months. The median overall survival after the first relapse (OS2) was 4 months. Patients aged 70 or younger with good performance status who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation as second‐line treatment had significantly better OS2 of 39 months (p = 0.002). OS2 for patients without ASCT consolidation remained at 3 months. Age over 70 years, poor performance status, and a first‐line progression‐free survival of less than 6 months negatively impacted the prognosis.ConclusionThis study confirms previous findings of poor outcomes in patients with relapsed PCNSL. Some subgroups, particularly those receiving ASCT consolidation, can achieve long‐term remission with current treatment options. New treatment strategies are needed for patients ineligible for ASCT or those who do not respond to salvage induction therapies.
Male, Adult, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Transplantation, Autologous, Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Humans, Female, Finland, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Male, Adult, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Transplantation, Autologous, Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Humans, Female, Finland, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
