
doi: 10.1111/eip.12178
pmid: 25175055
AbstractAimsThe aim of the current study was to create a typology of patients with first‐episode psychosis based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, service use and outcomes using cluster analysis.MethodsData from all respondents who were accepted into the Early Psychosis Intervention Programme (EPIP), Singapore from 2007 to 2011 were analysed. A two‐step clustering method was carried out to classify the patients into distinct clusters.ResultsTwo clusters were identified. Cluster 1 comprised largely of younger people with mean age of 25.5 (6.0) years at treatment contact, who were predominantly male (55.3%), single (98.3%) and living with parents (86.3%). Cluster 1 had a higher proportion of people diagnosed with the schizophrenia spectrum disorder (71.4%) and with a positive family history of psychiatric illness. Patients in cluster 2 were generally older with a mean age of 33.6 (4.7) years and the majority were women (74.2%). Cluster 1 had people with higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores at baseline as compared with cluster 2. After a 1‐year follow up, their scores were still poorer than their counterparts in cluster 2, especially for PANSS negative score. The functioning level of people in cluster 1 showed less improvement than the people in cluster 2 after a year of treatment.ConclusionsThere is a compelling need to develop new therapies and intensively treat young people presenting with psychosis as this group tends to have poorer outcomes even after 1 year of treatment.
Adult, Family Health, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Young Adult, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, Psychotic Disorders, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Female, Antipsychotic Agents, Demography
Adult, Family Health, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Young Adult, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, Psychotic Disorders, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Female, Antipsychotic Agents, Demography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
