
doi: 10.1111/ecin.12774
We investigate the practice of framing a price as a discount from an earlier price, with information such as “was $200, now $100.” We discuss two reasons why a discounted price—rather than a merely low price—can make a consumer more willing to purchase. First, a high initial price can indicate the seller has chosen to supply a high‐quality product. Second, when a seller with limited stock runs a clearance sale, later consumers infer that unsold stock has higher expected quality when its initial price was higher. We also suggest a behavioral explanation, which is that consumers with reference‐dependence preferences are more likely to buy if they perceive the price as a bargain relative to the earlier price. Discount pricing is therefore an effective marketing technique, and a seller may wish to deceive potential customers by offering a false discount. The welfare effects of regulation to prevent fictitious pricing are subtle, with potential unintended consequences, and depend on whether consumers are sophisticated or naive. (JELD18, D42, D83, L15, M31)
L15 - Information and Product Quality, D42 - Monopoly, Communication, reference dependence; price discounts; sales tactics; false advertising, Unawareness, Information and Knowledge, M31 - Marketing, Reference dependence, Price discounts, Sales tactics, False advertising, M37 - Advertising, D83 - Search, Belief, Learning, M3 - Marketing and Advertising, Standardization and Compatibility, consumer protection; consumer search; false advertising; price discrimination; Reference dependence, D18 - Consumer Protection, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D03, jel: jel:M3, jel: jel:D18
L15 - Information and Product Quality, D42 - Monopoly, Communication, reference dependence; price discounts; sales tactics; false advertising, Unawareness, Information and Knowledge, M31 - Marketing, Reference dependence, Price discounts, Sales tactics, False advertising, M37 - Advertising, D83 - Search, Belief, Learning, M3 - Marketing and Advertising, Standardization and Compatibility, consumer protection; consumer search; false advertising; price discrimination; Reference dependence, D18 - Consumer Protection, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D03, jel: jel:M3, jel: jel:D18
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
