
doi: 10.1111/eci.13386
pmid: 32810283
AbstractBackgroundPlatelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a haematological index which reflects increased level of inflammation and thrombosis. We aimed to summarize the potential prognostic role of PLR for the in‐hospital and long‐term outcomes in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in a meta‐analysis.Materials and methodsRelevant cohort studies were identified by search the PubMed, Cochrane's Library and Embase databases. A random‐effect model was applied to pool the results. In‐hospital and long‐term outcomes were compared between patients with higher and lower preprocedural PLR.ResultsEleven cohorts with 12 619 patients were included. Pooled results showed that higher preprocedural PLR was independently associated with increased risk of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, risk ratio [RR]: 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39 to 2.22, P < .001; I2 = 49%), cardiac mortality (RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.18 to 3.09, P = .009; I2 = 0), all‐cause mortality (RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.01, P < .001, I2 = 24%) and no reflow after pPCI (RR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.90, P < .001, I2 = 59%). Moreover, higher preprocedural PLR was associated with increased risk of MACE (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.03, I2 = 57%, P < .001) and all‐cause mortality (RR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53 to 3.66, I2 = 78%, P < .001) during long‐term follow‐up of up to 82 months after discharge.ConclusionsHigher PLR predicts poor in‐hospital and long‐term prognosis in STEMI patients after pPCI.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Cardiovascular Diseases, Platelet Count, Cause of Death, Humans, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Hospital Mortality, Lymphocyte Count, Mortality, Prognosis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Cardiovascular Diseases, Platelet Count, Cause of Death, Humans, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Hospital Mortality, Lymphocyte Count, Mortality, Prognosis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
