
doi: 10.1111/echo.15902
pmid: 39136253
AbstractCardiac compartmental size depends on sex, with smaller values found in (healthy) women compared to a matched group of men. Various types of heart disease may cause dilation of the affected chamber. For example, atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with enlarged left atrial (LA) size, often also implying increased left ventricular (LV) size. Sex‐specific differences appear to persist during disease states. Thus, chamber volumes depend on both sex and the severity of the underlying disorder, and require quantification to evaluate the effect of interventions. Often, we rely on the popular performance metric ejection fraction (EF) which refers to the ratio of the minimum and maximum LV or LA volumetric values observed during the cardiac cycle. Here we discuss a sex stratified analysis of LVEF and LAEF in AF patients as treated by LA appendage closure, while comparing those with or without device‐related thrombosis. Also, an alternative analysis based on primary data is presented while emphasizing its attractiveness. In any event, age‐ and sex‐specific reference values as broadly documented for various imaging modalities should be applied to LA and LV.
Male, device-related thrombus, sex difference, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, atrial fibrillation, ratio-based metric, Female, Atrial Appendage, Stroke Volume, Thrombosis, left atrial appendage closure
Male, device-related thrombus, sex difference, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, atrial fibrillation, ratio-based metric, Female, Atrial Appendage, Stroke Volume, Thrombosis, left atrial appendage closure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
