Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Echocardiographyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Echocardiography
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Echocardiography
Article . 2023
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Determinants of myocardial work indices in women

Authors: Ruta Jasaityte; Rija Bajraktarevic; Daniela Blaschke‐Waluga; Ute Seeland; Vera Regitz‐Zagrosek; Ulf Landmesser; Karl Stangl; +3 Authors

Determinants of myocardial work indices in women

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveBy incorporating myocardial deformation and afterload, novel echocardiographic myocardial work indices appear to be advantageous compared to load‐dependent left ventricular (LV) deformation analyses. As such, these indices may provide a more accurate and, above all, load‐independent estimation of LV function in patients with chronically increased afterload. To date however, data on the relation of these indices to clinical and conventional echocardiographic parameters are scarce.PurposeOur aim was to evaluate the relationship between myocardial work indices and age, body mass index (BMI), NTproBNP, the clinical history of arterial hypertension and diastolic dysfunction as well as selected conventional echocardiographic parameters in women.MethodsWe analyzed echocardiographic data of women included in the Berlin Female Risk Evaluation (BEFRI) trial. Global Work Index (GWI), Global Constructive Work (GCW), Global Wasted Work (GWW) and Global Work Efficiency (GWE) were calculated using commercially available software based on noninvasive pressure‐strain loops. The impact of selected clinical and echocardiographic characteristics on myocardial work parameters was investigated by uni‐ and multivariate regression analyses.ResultsA total of 224 women were included in the final analysis. 155 of them were normotensive and 69 had a history of arterial hypertension. Diastolic dysfunction was more prevalent in subjects with arterial hypertension. Study participants with arterial hypertension showed higher GWI and GCW whereas GWW and GWE did not significantly differ between groups. GCW and GWW were lower and GWE higher in the presence of normal diastolic function. In multivariate regression analyses, arterial hypertension, LV GLS, and interventricular septal thickness were significantly associated with GWI. GCW showed significant associations with the clinical history of arterial hypertension, LV GLS, age and IVRT. Similarly, LV GLS, IVRT and mitral inflow E wave deceleration time were identified to be significant determinants of GWW and GWE.ConclusionOur data confirm that, in a randomly selected sample of the general urban female population, myocardial work parameters are predominantly determined by LV GLS. In addition, the presence of arterial hypertension was identified to be a significant determinant of GWI and GCW, but not for GWW and GWE. Finally, a prolonged LV relaxation time was significantly associated with GWW and GWE, suggesting more wasted myocardial work and lower GWE values with increasing LV relaxation time.

Keywords

Diastole, Echocardiography, Myocardium, Hypertension, Humans, Female, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Body Mass Index

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!