
doi: 10.1111/dth.12536
pmid: 28805286
This questionnaire-based study was aimed to measure the level of appreciation, awareness of the special tips, and practice patterns of monopolar radiofrequency among Korean dermatologists practicing a specific monopolar radiofrequency device (Thermage® Inc., Hayward, CA). A total of 82 surveys were analyzed to show that the majority of participants (78.8%) were highly satisfied with the outcomes of monopolar radiofrequency treatment. All respondents were aware of the Eye Tip 0.25 cm2 , and the majority knew the difference between the Face tip (blue) and the Total tip (orange). Most (86.3%) agreed to the statement that 900 shots were appropriate for facial tightening in those between the ages of 35 and 65 years. 66.2% of participants reported to have perform monopolar radiofrequency to extra-facial sites within the past year. As for the tips, the Total tip was most popular for all body sties and the Big tip was favored for the abdomen, thighs and buttock. We hope our data allow dermatologists to better utilize monopolar radiofrequency.
Adult, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Cosmetic Techniques, Middle Aged, Radiofrequency Therapy, Skin Aging, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Surveys, Republic of Korea, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Aged, Dermatologists
Adult, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Cosmetic Techniques, Middle Aged, Radiofrequency Therapy, Skin Aging, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Surveys, Republic of Korea, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Aged, Dermatologists
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
