Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Poliglecaprone-25 and Polyglactin-910 in Cutaneous Surgery

Authors: Thomas, Regan; Naomi, Lawrence;

Comparison of Poliglecaprone-25 and Polyglactin-910 in Cutaneous Surgery

Abstract

Few clinical studies have compared deep absorbable sutures. Poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 are two of the most commonly used absorbable sutures in cutaneous surgery.To compare the rate of suture extrusion, degree of lumpiness, and appearance of scars from wounds closed with poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910.Poliglecaprone-25 or polyglactin-910 was used for closure of the deep part of Mohs defects. The number of extruded sutures and the number of lumps were recorded at each follow-up visit. Photographs of 1-week and 3-month postoperative scars were rated on a visual analogue scale.One hundred forty patients completed the study. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of extruded sutures between poliglecaprone-25 (3.1%) and polyglactin-910 (11.4%) (p < .01). There was not a statistically significant difference in the percentage of lumps (both 22%) or overall appearance of scars at 1 week or 3 months.Poliglecaprone-25 resulted in significantly less extruded sutures than did polyglactin-910, although both resulted in the same degree of lumpiness and similar-appearing scars at 1 week and 3 months.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Sutures, Polyesters, Ear, Nose, Mohs Surgery, Dioxanes, Cicatrix, Humans, Female, Polyglactin 910, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!