Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Diabetes Obesity and...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors on kidney outcomes

Authors: Daniel V. O'Hara; Thomas R. Parkhill; Sunil V. Badve; Min Jun; Meg J. Jardine; Vlado Perkovic;

The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors on kidney outcomes

Abstract

Abstract Aims To summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors on kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods The Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs comparing DPP‐4 inhibitors with a placebo, active comparator or standard care, with at least 500 person‐years follow‐up in patients with T2DM and with reporting of kidney outcomes. Treatment effects were summarized using random‐effects meta‐analysis. Results Ten trials including 47 955 patients (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 71 mL/min/1.73m 2 , mean follow‐up 10 762 patient‐years per trial) were eligible for inclusion. DPP‐4 inhibitors were compared with placebo (five trials), active comparator (three trials), and standard care (two trials). Overall, treatment with DPP‐4 inhibitors was associated with a greater decline in eGFR than treatment with the comparators (weighted mean difference −1.12 mL/min/1.73m 2 , 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.61, −0.62; high‐certainty evidence). There were no detectable effects of DPP‐4 inhibitors on rates of doubling serum creatinine (risk ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.90, 1.34; high‐certainty evidence), end‐stage kidney disease (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77, 1.23; high‐certainty evidence), death from kidney causes (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.67, 4.93; low‐certainty evidence), or all‐cause mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95, 1.09; high‐certainty evidence). DPP‐4 inhibitors significantly reduced the risks of the surrogate kidney outcome of new albuminuria (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.8, 0.98; moderate‐certainty evidence) and worsening albuminuria (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82, 0.94; moderate‐certainty evidence). There was no difference in the safety outcome of acute kidney injury (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.57, 1.87; high‐certainty evidence). Conclusions Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors are associated with a greater decline in eGFR, despite reducing the development and progression of albuminuria, and have no clear effect on other key kidney outcomes.

Keywords

Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases, Kidney

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!