
AimTo evaluate seizure phenomenology, treatment, and course in individuals with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL).MethodData from an ongoing natural history study of JNCL were analyzed using cross‐sectional and longitudinal methods. Seizures were evaluated with the Unified Batten Disease Rating Scale, a disease‐specific quantitative assessment tool.ResultsEighty‐six children (44 males, 42 females) with JNCL were assessed at an average of three annual visits (range 1–11). Eighty‐six percent (n=74) experienced at least one seizure, most commonly generalized tonic–clonic, with mean age at onset of 9 years 7 months (SD 2y 10mo). Seizures were infrequent, typically occurring less often than once every 3 months, and were managed with one to two medications for most participants. Valproate (49%, n=36) and levetiracetam (41%, n=30) were the most commonly used seizure medications. Myoclonic seizures occurred infrequently (16%, n=14). Seizure severity did not vary by sex or genotype. Seizures showed mild worsening with increasing age.InterpretationThe neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) represent a group of disorders unified by neurodegeneration and symptoms of blindness, seizures, motor impairment, and dementia. While NCLs are considered in the differential diagnosis of progressive myoclonus epilepsy, we show that myoclonic seizures are infrequent in JNCL. This highlights the NCLs as consisting of genetically distinct disorders with differing natural history.
Adult, Adolescent, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Seizures, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Age of Onset, Child
Adult, Adolescent, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Seizures, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Age of Onset, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
