Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Developmental Medici...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2013
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 2013
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Executive function in children and adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy

Authors: Bodimeade, H.; Whittingham, K.; Lloyd, O.; Boyd, Roslyn;

Executive function in children and adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy

Abstract

AimThe aim of this study was to compare executive function in children with left‐ and right‐sided unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) and typically developing children.MethodThere was a cross‐sectional cohort of 46 children with unilateralCP(24 right‐side, 22 left‐side; 25 males, 21 females; mean age 11y 1mo,SD2y 5mo) and 20 typically developing children (nine males, 11 females; mean age 10y 10mo,SD2y 4mo). Four cognitive domains of executive function were assessed: attentional control, cognitive flexibility, goal setting, and information processing. Subtests from the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System, the Test of Everyday Attention for Children, the Rey–Osterrieth Complex figure, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition were utilized. Between‐group differences (right unilateralCP, left unilateralCP, and typically developing children) were examined using analyses of covariance.ResultsChildren withCPperformed significantly more poorly than typically developing children on all executive function measures (aggregate executive function:F(1,63)=31.16;p<0.001; η2=0.33). There were no significant differences between children with left and right unilateralCP, except in the case of inhibition/switching total errors, with children with left unilateralCPmaking fewer errors than children with right unilateralCP(F(1,39)=4.14;p=0.049; η2=0.1).InterpretationChildren and adolescents with unilateralCPexperience difficulties across multiple executive function domains compared with typically developing children, irrespective of the side of hemiplegia. This finding supports an early vulnerability model of early brain injury and has implications for intervention for children withCP.

Country
Australia
Keywords

Male, Adolescent, 150, Neuropsychological Tests, Functional Laterality, 618, 2806 Developmental Neuroscience, Disability Evaluation, Executive Function, Mental Processes, Working-Memory, Impairments, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, 2735 Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Child, Ability, Language, Analysis of Variance, Cerebral Palsy, Perinatology, and Child Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Linear Models, Female, 2735 Pediatrics, 2728 Clinical Neurology, Cognition Disorders, Goals

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    84
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
84
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!