Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Digestive Endoscopyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Digestive Endoscopy
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography

Authors: Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Koji Matsuda; Yoshihide Kanno; Kazuo Hara; Takeshi Ogura; Nobutsugu Abe; +10 Authors

Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography

Abstract

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosongraphy (I‐EUS) procedures have rapidly evolved since their introduction three decades ago; however, the classification and terminology for these procedures remain unstandardized. To address this, the Subcommittee for Terminology of I‐EUS in the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society was established to define classifications and a glossary of I‐EUS terms. They categorized I‐EUS procedures into five types based on purpose and method: (i) EUS‐guided sampling; (ii) EUS‐guided through‐the‐needle examination; (iii) EUS‐guided drainage/anastomosis (EUS‐D/A); (iv) trans‐endosonographically/EUS‐guided created route (ESCR) procedures; and (v) EUS‐guided delivery. EUS‐guided sampling includes tissue acquisition and fluid sampling, classified by needle type into fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Through‐the‐needle examinations include imaging, measurements, and biopsies. EUS‐D/A includes organ drainage/anastomosis, fluid collection drainage, and digestive tract anastomosis. In the EUS‐D/A route, “anastomosis” is used for organ‐to‐organ procedures, whereas “tract” is for fluid drainage. ESCR is a newly proposed term for procedures via anastomosis or tract, such as endoscopic necrosectomy and EUS‐guided antegrade stenting. The term “trans‐luminal drainage/anastomosis stent” is used for stents that maintain the ESCR rather than treating strictures. EUS‐guided delivery involves the delivery of substances, such as fluids, drugs, medical devices, and energy. This proposed categorization and terminology aimed to clarify I‐EUS procedures and will require updates as new techniques and concepts emerge.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!