
doi: 10.1111/den.13838
pmid: 32920920
BackgroundManagement of diminutive pharyngeal neoplasms is controversial. Thus, we conducted a single‐center, prospective pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic excision with cold forceps biopsy (CFB) of these lesions.Patients and MethodsThirty‐nine lesions endoscopically diagnosed with narrow‐band imaging as pharyngeal neoplasms of 3 mm or smaller were excised with CFB using jumbo biopsy forceps (cap diameter 2.8 mm, jaw volume 12.4 mm3). The primary outcome was endoscopically determined local remnant/recurrence rate 3 months after CFB. The secondary outcomes were histopathologically determined local remnant/recurrence rate; risk factors associated with the endoscopic remnant/recurrence; and incidence of intraoperative or delayed bleeding and other adverse events.ResultsHistological diagnosis of the 39 CFB‐excised lesions were: 11 high‐grade dysplasia (28.2%), 22 low‐grade dysplasia (56.4%), two basal cell hyperplasia (5.1%) and four atypical squamous epithelium (10.3%).Twenty‐seven patients (30 lesions) underwent follow‐up endoscopy 3 months after CFB; the endoscopic and pathological local remnant/recurrence rate was 20% (6/30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.7–36.6%) and 16.7% (5/30; 95% CI, 5.6–34.7%), respectively. Location of the lesion in the hypopharynx was a significant risk factor associated with the endoscopic local remnant/recurrence (P = 0.049). No significant adverse events occurred.ConclusionsCold forceps biopsy with jumbo biopsy forceps appears to be a safe and effective technique for excising diminutive pharyngeal neoplasms. Although small, the excised lesions may have a remarkably high frequency of high‐grade dysplasia. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000037980).
Biopsy, Humans, Pharyngeal Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Surgical Instruments
Biopsy, Humans, Pharyngeal Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Surgical Instruments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
