Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Digestive Endoscopyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Digestive Endoscopy
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and management of residues for superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial neoplasms

Authors: Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Yoji Takeuchi; Yasushi Yamasaki; Kentaro Nakagawa; Masayasu Ohmori; Kenshi Matsuno; Shuntaro Inoue; +9 Authors

Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and management of residues for superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial neoplasms

Abstract

Background and AimUnderwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is effective for superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial neoplasms (SNADEN). However, the incidence of residual lesion after UEMR, especially for large lesions (≥20 mm), and their prognosis remain unclear. We aimed to assess the incidence of residual lesions and further outcomes after UEMR for SNADEN.MethodsWe carried out a retrospective study at a tertiary cancer institute. Candidates for the study were systematically retrieved from an endoscopic and pathological database from January 2013 to April 2018.ResultsA total of 162 SNADEN resected with UEMR were analyzed. Median (range) procedure time was 5 (1–70) min. En bloc resection rates for large lesions (≥20 mm) and small lesions (<20 mm) were 14% and 79%, respectively. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in one (0.6%) case, but no intraprocedural perforation occurred during the study. Delayed bleeding occurred in two (1.2%) cases and delayed perforation occurred in one (0.6%) case. A total of 157 (97%) lesions were followed up by at least one endoscopic examination. Of these lesions, residual lesions were recognized in seven cases (5%). Additional UEMR was carried out in five lesions and underwater cold snare polypectomy in one lesion. One lesion was observed without additional treatment. After salvage intervention, no cases experienced further residual lesions.ConclusionAlthough UEMR for SNADEN can be relevant when other efficacious procedures are unavailable, careful follow up for residual lesions is required especially after piecemeal resection for large lesions.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Neoplasm, Residual, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Incidence, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Duodenal Neoplasms, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Intestinal Mucosa, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    40
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
40
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!