
doi: 10.1111/cup.13484
pmid: 31020686
AbstractBackgroundA eukaryotic cell's primary cilium (PC) is critical for cell signaling, migration and homeostasis. Primary cilium dysfunction has been demonstrated in several malignancies, but whether primary cilia loss occurs in acral melanoma has remained unknown. To address this, we examined the ciliation index (% melanocytes containing a PC) of patient‐derived, biopsy‐proven acral melanoma and compared these to benign acral nevi.MethodsWe generated a pilot initiative study that included six acral melanomas and seven acral nevi derived from the foot. Using fluorescent immunohistochemistry, we calculated ciliation indexes of Sox10+ melanocytes.ResultsAverage ciliation index for acral nevi was 74.0% (SE of the mean [SEM] 3.3%) vs 9.3% for acral melanoma (SEM 5.7%), finding a statistically significant difference between the groups (P‐value <.001, two tailed t test).ConclusionThe data show a significant loss of primary cilia in malignant acral melanoma vs benign acral nevi, suggesting that cilia may play an important role during acral melanoma formation. Our data, which should be validated by a larger study with longer follow‐up period, suggest that examining ciliation index may be a useful diagnostic test when distinguishing benign acral nevi from melanoma.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Skin Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Diagnosis, Differential, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Humans, Female, Cilia, Melanoma, Nevus, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Skin Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Diagnosis, Differential, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Humans, Female, Cilia, Melanoma, Nevus, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
