AbstractObjectiveOrgan dysfunction (OD) after lung transplantation can reflect preoperative organ failure, intraoperative acute organ damage and post‐operative complications. We assessed two OD scoring systems, both the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) and the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) scores, in recognizing risk factors for morbidity as well as recipients with prolonged post‐transplant morbidity.DesignMedical records of recipients from January 2009 to March 2016 were reviewed. PELOD and pSOFA scores were calculated on post‐transplant days 1‐3. Risk factors assessed included cystic fibrosis (CF), prolonged surgical time and worst primary graft dysfunction (PGD) score amongst others. Patients were classified into three groups based on their initial scores (group A) and subsequent trends either uptrending (group B) or downtrending (group C). Morbidity outcomes were compared between these groups.ResultsTotal 98 patients were enrolled aged 0–20 years. Risk factors for higher pSOFA scores ≥ 5 on day 1 included non‐CF diagnosis and worst PGD scores (p = .0006 and p = .03, respectively). Kruskal Wallis analysis comparing pSOFA group A versus B versus C scores showed significantly prolonged ventilatory days (median 1 vs. 4 vs. 2, p = .0028) and ICU days (median 4 vs. 10 vs. 6, p = .007). Similarly, PELOD group A versus B versus C scores showed significantly prolonged ventilatory days (1 vs. 5 vs. 2, p = < .0001).ConclusionImplementing pSOFA scores bedside is a more effective tool compared to PELOD in identifying risk factors for worsened OD post‐lung transplant and can be valuable in providing direction on morbidity outcomes in the ICU.