ABSTRACT Effective conservation of degraded ecosystems requires mitigation of the original cause of decline, but this is difficult in the context of global climate change. On coral reefs, persistent environmental stress, which causes coral bleaching, may be addressed in restoration efforts by using coral stocks which are naturally more resilient, an approach termed “proactive restoration” in terrestrial management. To explore the feasibility and consequences of this approach, we outplanted 391 colonies of seven species of reef‐building coral designated as “thermally tolerant” or “thermally sensitive” via stress testing and monitored them for 2 years using photogrammetry to evaluate tradeoffs and Relative Return‐on‐Effort. We found no growth, complexity, or effort tradeoffs when using thermally tolerant corals, but tolerant corals had lower survivorship during our monitoring period, driven primarily by one genus. These data illustrate nuanced tradeoffs and consequences to proactive reef restoration and suggest that the potential benefits of this approach may only be fully realized during future coral bleaching events.