
AbstractAimComplex anal fistula represents a burden for patients, and its management is a challenge for surgeons. Video‐assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is one sphincter‐sparing technique. However, data on its long‐term effectiveness are scant. We aimed to explore the outcomes of VAAFT in a retrospective cohort of patients referred to a tertiary centre.MethodConsecutive adult patients with a minimum of 2 years’ follow‐up after VAAFT were reviewed. Patients were followed up to 5 years postoperatively. Failure was defined as incomplete healing of the external orifice(s) during the first 6 months. Recurrence was defined as new radiologically and/or clinically confirmed onset of the fistula after primary healing. A generalized linear model was fitted to evaluate the association between failure and sociodemographic characteristics. Predictors of recurrence were determined in a subgroup analysis of patients found to be free from disease at 6 months postoperatively.ResultsOverall, 106 patients (70% male; mean age 41 years) were reviewed. Of these 86% had a previous seton placement. Fistulas were either high trans‐sphincteric (74%), suprasphincteric (12%) or extrasphincteric (13%). Eight (7%) patients experienced postoperative complications, none of which required reintervention. Mean follow‐up was 53 ± 13.2 months. VAAFT failed in 14 (13%) patients. The overall recurrence rate ranged from 29% at 1 year to 63% at 5 years. Multiple external orifices, suprasphincteric fistula, younger age, previous surgery and higher complexity of the fistulous tract were independent risk factors for recurrence.ConclusionVAAFT is a safe sphincter‐sparing technique. The initially high success rate decreases over time and relates to a higher degree of complexity.
vaaft; anal fistula; sphincter-sparing; video-assisted, Adult, Male, vaaft, video-assisted, sphincter-sparing, Anal Canal, Video-Assisted Surgery, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, anal fistula, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Female, anal fistula; sphincter-sparing; VAAFT; video-assisted, Organ Sparing Treatments, Retrospective Studies
vaaft; anal fistula; sphincter-sparing; video-assisted, Adult, Male, vaaft, video-assisted, sphincter-sparing, Anal Canal, Video-Assisted Surgery, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, anal fistula, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Female, anal fistula; sphincter-sparing; VAAFT; video-assisted, Organ Sparing Treatments, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
