AbstractAimLigaSure™ is an electro‐surgical device that has increasingly been utilized in haemorrhoid surgery. However, recent literature has highlighted a possible increased risk of delayed postoperative bleeding following LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy (LH). We aim to evaluate the rates of postoperative bleeding following LigaSure compared to Ferguson (closed) haemorrhoidectomy (FH).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was undertaken at our single academic safety‐net county hospital from August 2016 through July 2019 evaluating patients who received FH or LH. Patient demographics, surgical data, postoperative emergency department visit for pain or bleeding within 30 days and resulting transfusion requirement, and rates of readmission and interventions within 30 days were collected.ResultsSixty‐one FH and 66 LH patients were identified. The groups had no difference in demographics. The LH group and FH group had similar rates of postoperative emergency department visits (29% vs. 23%, P = 0.454), as well as visits for bleeding (20% vs. 11%, P = 0.204). The average operating time was also significantly shorter with LH (14.5 min vs. 24.9 min, P ≤ 0.001). On multivariate analysis, male sex (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.88–28.25) and haemorrhoid grade ≤2 (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.31–16.49) were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding on multivariate analysis. Use of LH was not independently associated with postoperative bleeding risk (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.70–5.11).ConclusionsLH and FH have similar risks for postoperative bleeding and other complications. Male sex and haemorrhoid Grades 1 or 2 may be associated with increased postoperative bleeding risk. Excisional haemorrhoidectomy should be undertaken with caution for male patients with lower internal haemorrhoid grades.