Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Colorectal Diseasearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Colorectal Disease
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Research.fi
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Research.fi
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Health‐related quality of life in colorectal cancer

Authors: Sintonen H.; Järvinen Heikki; Taari K.; Saarto T.; Sintonen H.; Järvinen Heikki; Taari K.; +2 Authors

Health‐related quality of life in colorectal cancer

Abstract

AbstractAimAs a consequence of the improved survival of patients and of cost‐effectiveness requirements for new treatments, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) issues have gained increasing attention in colorectal cancer (CRC). This cross‐sectional study assesses HRQoL in several health states of CRC and explores factors influencing HRQoL.MethodFive hundred and eight Finnish CRC patients (aged 26–96 years; colon cancer 56%; women 47%) assessed their HRQoL using generic 15D and EQ‐5D and cancer‐specific EORTC QLQ‐C30 questionnaires. Patients were divided into five groups: primary treatment, rehabilitation, remission, metastatic disease and palliative care. The patients' HRQoL was compared with population reference values. Multivariate modelling was used to find factors associated with HRQoL scores.ResultsThe HRQoL of CRC patients is fairly good and comparable with that of the standardized general population except for those under palliative care. The mean 15D score of patients in the primary treatment group was 0.889 (95% CI 0.869–0.914), in rehabilitation 0.877 (0.855–0.907), in remission 0.886 (0.875–0.903), in metastatic disease 0.860 (0.844–0.878) and in palliative care 0.758 (0.716–0.808). The respective EQ‐5D scores were 0.760 (0.699–0.823), 0.835 (0.777–0.881), 0.850 (0.828–0.882), 0.820 (0.783–0.858) and 0.643 (0.546–0.747). Multivariate analysis showed that fatigue, pain, age and financial difficulties had a marked negative impact on HRQoL.ConclusionThe mean HRQoL scores of CRC patients varied considerably depending on the HRQoL instrument used, but remained surprisingly good up to the palliative stage. In addition to age‐ and cancer‐related symptoms, financial difficulties also had a clear negative impact on HRQoL, which needs to be taken into consideration when supporting patient HRQoL.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Health Status, Palliative Care, Middle Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Cross-Sectional Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    75
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
75
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!