
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13938
pmid: 35561039
Abstract Global wildlife trade spreads emerging infectious diseases that threaten biodiversity. The amphibian chytrid pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has caused population declines and species extinctions worldwide except in Asia. Fire‐bellied toads ( Bombina orientalis ), exported in large numbers from Asia, are tolerant of Bd and carry hypervirulent ancestral chytrid BdAsia‐1 variants. We assayed the virulence of a new isolate of BdAsia‐1 on the model Australasian frog host Litoria caerulea . Infected individuals ( n = 15) all showed rapid disease progression culminating in death, whereas sham‐inoculated individuals ( n = 10) presented no clinical signs of disease and all survived (log rank test, χ 2 = 15.6, df = 1, p < 0.0001). The virulence of the new isolate of BdAsia‐1 is comparable to the one we assayed previously (χ 2 = 0.0, df = 1, p = 0.91). Internationally traded wildlife, even when they appear healthy, can carry hypervirulent variants of pathogens. Once new pathogen variants escape into the environment, native species that have had no opportunity to evolve resistance to them may perish. Our study suggests that hypervirulent pathogens are being spread by the international pet trade. Notifiable wildlife diseases attributable to locally endemic pathogens often fail to generate conservation concern so are rarely subject to border surveillance or import controls. Because of the danger novel variants pose, national border control agencies need to implement disease screening and quarantine protocols to ensure the safety of their endemic fauna.
Amphibians, Conservation of Natural Resources, Chytridiomycota, Animals, Animals, Wild, Anura, Extinction, Biological
Amphibians, Conservation of Natural Resources, Chytridiomycota, Animals, Animals, Wild, Anura, Extinction, Biological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
