
doi: 10.1111/coa.13980
pmid: 36106575
AbstractObjectivesFungal rhinosinusitis is an inflammatory disease of the nose that may lead to life‐threatening complications. This study compared the bacterial and fungal microbiomes between patients with invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (IFRS) and non‐IFRS (NIFRS).DesignThis was a prospective study including 18 IFRS and NIFRS patients. Fungal and bacterial microbiomes from surgical specimens were sequenced from amplicons of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region and the V3–V4 region of the 16S locus, respectively. Microbiomes were generated using the Illumina MiSeq System 2 x 301 base pair chemistry with a paired‐end protocol.SettingTertiary medical centre.ResultsTargeted metagenomics identified Aspergillus spp. as the predominant fungus in both IFRS and NIFRS patients. Based on phylum and genera level diversity, and abundance differences, significant differences of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria and Streptococcus) were more abundant in NIFRS compared with IFRS patients.ConclusionsThis is the first study to analyse bacterial and fungal microbiomes in patients with IFRS and NIFRS via ITS1 and 16S genomics sequencing. Bacterial microbiomes from patients with IFRS demonstrated dysbiosis (alterations in diversity and abundance) compared to those from patients with NIFRS.
Bacteria, Microbiota, Humans, Streptococcus, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Prospective Studies
Bacteria, Microbiota, Humans, Streptococcus, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
