Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Otolaryngol...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Otolaryngology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Validity of laryngomalacia classification systems: A multi‐institutional agreement study

Authors: Shanmugappiriya Sivarajah; Andre Isaac; Shelaina Anderson; Deepak Mehta; Paul Hong; Yaser Alrajhi; Hamdy El‐Hakim;

Validity of laryngomalacia classification systems: A multi‐institutional agreement study

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo determine the agreement of paediatric otolaryngologists on classifying laryngomalacia (LM).DesignIntra‐ and interobserver agreement study of two classification systems.SettingThree tertiary referral paediatric centres.ParticipantsThree paediatric otolaryngologists, who were blinded to any clinical details, interpreted the videos of children diagnosed with LM using the Holinger and Olney classifications independently. They rated the videos twice with a washout period of at least 2 weeks.The main outcome measuresInter‐ and intra‐observer agreement measured by overall Fleiss kappa and unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients. The secondary outcome measures were inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on the individual anatomical subunits of the supraglottis affected by LM, characterised by the subcategories of the classifications.ResultsVideo records of infants and children <18 years who had an endoscopic diagnosis of LM from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively chosen for inclusion (n = 73). The overall Fleiss kappa coefficient was 0.25 (95% CI 0.18‐0.32) amongst the raters using the Holinger classification and 0.31 (95% CI 0.21‐0.42) for the Olney classification. Intra‐observer agreement using the Holinger classification was 0.30 (95% CI 0.18‐0.42), 0.62 (95% CI 0.23‐0.85) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.75‐0.94], whilst the Olney classification yielded values of 0.41 (95% CI 0.26‐0.56), 0.51 (95% CI 0.29‐0.63) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.48‐0.78).ConclusionsThe agreement on types of LM between expert observers is modest using the Holinger and Olney classifications. This has significant implications for accurately diagnosing LM and exposes potential obstacles against credible pooling of data and extrapolation of information.

Keywords

Male, Consensus, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Video Recording, Infant, Laryngomalacia, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!