
AbstractAimsTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is widely used to treat a variety of disorders because it is noninvasive, safe, and well tolerated by awake patients. However, long‐term and repetitive taVNS is difficult to achieve in awake mice. Therefore, developing a new taVNS method that fully mimics the method used in clinical settings and is well‐tolerated by awake mice is greatly important for generalizing research findings related to the effects of taVNS. The study aimed to develop a new taVNS device for use in awake mice and to test its reliability and effectiveness.MethodsWe demonstrated the reliability of this taVNS device through retrograde neurotropic pseudorabies virus (PRV) tracing and evaluated its effectiveness through morphological analysis. After 3 weeks of taVNS application, the open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze (EPM) were used to evaluate anxiety‐like behaviors, and the Y‐maze test and novel object recognition test (NORT) were used to evaluate recognition memory behaviors, respectively.ResultsWe found that repetitive taVNS was well tolerated by awake mice, had no effect on anxiety‐like behaviors, and significantly improved memory.ConclusionOur findings suggest that this new taVNS device for repetitive stimulation of awake mice is safe, tolerable, and effective.
Male, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Recognition, Psychology, Anxiety, Herpesvirus 1, Suid, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Animals, Feasibility Studies, Original Article, Wakefulness, Maze Learning, Open Field Test
Male, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Recognition, Psychology, Anxiety, Herpesvirus 1, Suid, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Animals, Feasibility Studies, Original Article, Wakefulness, Maze Learning, Open Field Test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
