
AbstractThe relationships of the hyline tribe Dendropsophini remain poorly studied, with most published analyses dealing with few of the species groups ofDendropsophus. In order to test the monophyly of Dendropsophini, its genera, and the species groups currently recognized inDendropsophus, we performed a total evidence phylogenetic analysis. The molecular dataset included sequences of three mitochondrial and five nuclear genes from 210 terminals, including 12 outgroup species, the two species ofXenohyla, and 93 of the 108 recognized species ofDendropsophus. The phenomic dataset includes 46 terminals, one per species (34Dendropsophus, oneXenohyla, and 11 outgroup species). Our results corroborate the monophyly of Dendropsophini and the reciprocal monophyly ofDendropsophusandXenohyla. Some species groups ofDendropsophusare paraphyletic (theD. microcephalus,D. minimus, andD. parvicepsgroups, and theD. rubicundulusclade). On the basis of our results, we recognize nine species groups; for three of them (D. leucophyllatus,D. microcephalus, andD. parvicepsgroups) we recognize some nominal clades to highlight specific morphology or relationships and facilitate species taxonomy. We further discuss the evolution of oviposition site selection, where our results show multiple instances of independent evolution of terrestrial egg clutches during the evolutionary history ofDendropsophus.
Cell Nucleus, XENOHYLA, 590, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DENDROPSOPHINI, HYLIDAE, Genes, Mitochondrial, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Animals, Anura, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Phylogeny, DENDROPSOPHUS
Cell Nucleus, XENOHYLA, 590, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DENDROPSOPHINI, HYLIDAE, Genes, Mitochondrial, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Animals, Anura, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Phylogeny, DENDROPSOPHUS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
